Bank of Baroda (Kenya) Limited has been forced into an unusual public defence of its existence after rumours that the lender was preparing to shut down its Kenyan operations began circulating, raising the spectre of a damaging depositor confidence crisis.
The bank issued a strongly worded clarification on September 18, dismissing the closure reports as “false and misleading” and telling customers, employees, business partners and the public not to rely on unverified information.
But the timing could hardly be more uncomfortable.
The shutdown rumours surfaced as the bank found itself under intense legal pressure over a Sh2.996 billion judgment in favour of Infinity Industrial Park Limited, with the High Court authorising the attachment of the lender’s movable assets to recover the money.
A warrant issued in the case directed Moran Auctioneers to attach Bank of Baroda’s movable and attachable property to the extent necessary to satisfy the judgment and associated costs. If the amount remains unpaid, the attached assets can be sold through a public auction.
That court action does not amount to an order closing the bank.
Neither does the evidence currently available establish that Bank of Baroda is experiencing a bank run or that depositors have launched a mass withdrawal campaign.
But the episode exposes how quickly a legal dispute involving a financial institution can mutate into a confidence problem once it collides with social-media speculation.
For a bank, perception can become a financial risk in its own right.
A rumour that a bank is shutting down can encourage customers to withdraw deposits, while the resulting anxiety can generate more rumours. It is precisely the type of feedback loop that regulators and banks seek to prevent because banking depends heavily on confidence.
Bank of Baroda therefore finds itself fighting on two fronts: a court battle over billions of shillings and an information battle over the survival of its Kenyan franchise.
The lender insists there is no shutdown.
“Bank of Baroda (Kenya) Limited wishes to clarify that reports circulating regarding the alleged closure of the Bank’s operations in Kenya are false and misleading,” the bank said in its September 18 statement.
It said its operations continued normally and reaffirmed its commitment to the Kenyan market.
The numbers published for the six months to June 30, 2026 provide important context.
Bank of Baroda reported a Sh3.16 billion profit after tax, up from Sh2.51 billion during the corresponding period of 2025. Operating income rose to Sh6.52 billion from Sh5.02 billion, while net interest income increased to Sh6.29 billion from Sh4.76 billion.
Its balance sheet, however, contains figures that deserve scrutiny rather than blanket reassurance.
Customer deposits stood at Sh161.22 billion, down from Sh163.59 billion a year earlier. Total assets were Sh202.26 billion, compared with Sh203.01 billion in June 2025.
At the same time, loans and advances increased from Sh67.52 billion to Sh70.15 billion.
Most strikingly, gross non-performing loans rose from Sh8.93 billion to Sh9.89 billion over the same period. Net non-performing loans after provisions stood at Sh4.52 billion.
These numbers do not, by themselves, demonstrate that the bank is in distress.
In fact, the lender’s shareholders’ funds increased from Sh35.63 billion to Sh38.02 billion over the same period, while its reported profitability strengthened significantly.
The bank has now gone further in defending its financial position.
In a statement published on September 21, Bank of Baroda said its latest regulatory disclosures showed continued strength in its business and financial position, citing higher gross loans and advances, strong year-on-year profitability and a balance sheet of approximately Sh201 billion.
That is the financial picture confronting the closure rumours: a profitable institution with a substantial balance sheet and capital base, but also one dealing with a sizeable court judgment, a decline in deposits and rising gross non-performing loans.
The legal dispute is particularly important because it provides the factual backdrop against which the shutdown claims gained traction.
The High Court dispute between Infinity Industrial Park and Bank of Baroda dates back to Commercial Case E322 of 2024. In July, the court dismissed the bank’s attempt to have a default judgment set aside.
The subsequent enforcement process culminated in a warrant directing attachment of the bank’s movable assets to recover Sh2,996,003,000.
The auction process is subject to court procedures, including notice requirements, and the auctioneer has been directed to report back to court by October 15 on execution of the warrant.
This distinction matters.
A bank having assets targeted for execution in a commercial judgment is not the same thing as a bank being placed under statutory management, declared insolvent or ordered to cease banking operations.
There is currently no evidence in the sources reviewed that the Central Bank of Kenya has announced a shutdown of Bank of Baroda (Kenya).
The bank is, however, confronting a reputational headache that cannot simply be dismissed as social-media noise.
Banking is uniquely vulnerable to confidence shocks because depositors do not need to wait for audited accounts or a court judgment before making a decision. A rumour circulating on WhatsApp can prompt a customer to move money within minutes.
That is why the bank’s September 18 statement was less a routine corporate announcement than a defensive intervention in the battle for depositor confidence.
The lender urged customers and stakeholders to rely on official communications and regulatory information rather than unverified reports.
Bank of Baroda has operated in Kenya since 1953 and remains one of the country’s longstanding foreign-owned banking institutions. The Central Bank of Kenya lists it among foreign-owned banks that are locally incorporated.
Its immediate challenge is therefore not merely to deny a rumour.
It is to prevent a rumour from becoming a self-fulfilling confidence crisis.
The bank’s published financial figures provide ammunition against claims of an imminent collapse: profitability is strong, shareholders’ funds have grown and the institution continues to report substantial lending and assets.
But the Sh2.996 billion enforcement battle is real. So is the decline in customer deposits. So is the increase in gross non-performing loans.
Those facts deserve scrutiny without being inflated into evidence of a bank failure.
For Bank of Baroda, the danger now lies in what happens when a courtroom fight, an auction warrant and an online closure rumour collide.
The bank says it is open for business.
The next test will be whether its customers believe it.
There's no story that cannot be told. We cover the stories that others don't want to be told, we bring you all the news you need. If you have tips, exposes or any story you need to be told bluntly and all queries write to us [email protected] also find us on Telegram
